← All comparisons
Solar panels for your EV

BMW i4 vs Mercedes EQE

Two German premium EVs, compared on solar cost

Both the i4 eDrive40 and the EQE 350+ are premium German EVs aimed at the same buyer, but the EQE's bigger 91 kWh battery and longer 654 km range come with slightly better efficiency too — 15.7 kWh/100km vs the i4's 16.3 kWh/100km. On solar, that narrow efficiency edge adds up over a year of charging.

i4
5.8yr payback
EQE
5.8yr payback
Panels Needed
i46EQE6
Payback Period
i45.8 yrEQE5.8 yr
Annual Savings
i4€584EQE€584
CO2 Saved / Year
i41.0 tEQE1.0 t
Verdict

i4 and EQE are evenly matched here — check the metrics below for the trade-off that matters most to you.

Personalize this comparison

Enter your address and driving habits — the results above update with real solar data.

Roof Surface Area65
Annual Driving Distance

Common Questions

Your questions,
answered.

The EQE is marginally more efficient than the i4 (15.7 vs 16.3 kWh/100km), so it needs slightly fewer panels for the same annual mileage — though the difference is smaller than in comparisons involving a Tesla.

With similar consumption figures, payback period for either car comes down more to your electricity price, roof size, and driving distance than the small efficiency gap between the two models.

A bigger battery means more range per charge, but it's annual kWh consumption — not battery size — that determines how many solar panels you need. The EQE's slightly better efficiency, not its battery size, is what narrows its solar footprint.

Solar panels for EV charging in GermanySolar Panels for EV Charging in Germany: Zero VAT, Low Feed-in, and Why Self-Consumption Is EverythingGermany has Europe's highest electricity prices and historic low feed-in tariffs — a combination that makes EV self-consumption the single most important solar decision you can make.Read the full guide

More comparisons